sustain:if:able kiwi

Interruptive Interviews at the Intersection of Psychology and Theology blog piece

I’m pleased to have a collaborative blog piece published on the Crosstraining Psychology and Theology blog.

Titled Interruptive Interviews at the Intersection of Psychology and Theology, it’s a collaboration with two colleagues in my Crosstraining cohort, Dr. Alison Woolley, Dr. Allen Jorgenson and myself.

The blog emerged from a comment made by Allen during a presentation, which resonated with my research experience and prompted a conversation with Alison afterward, who provided some intellectual resource. The result was the blog, in which we offer three qualitative research experiences from our interdisciplinary research in the Crosstraining programme and bring it into dialogue with theory in psychology and theology.

It was a delight to write with colleagues like Alison and Allen, who are not only smart and competent, but delightfully human. I’m grateful for the experience.

(The blog is the second blog piece I’ve had published with on the Crosstraining Psychology and Theology blog. The other was back in January, when I wrote a blog on Listening with Purpose II: A Theologian Reflects on the Interface between Theology and Psychology).

Listening in ministry and mission

It was lots of fun over this weekend speaking online to ordination candidates at Cuddesdon, England. We lived as a family at Cuddesdon for a Northern Hemisphere Christmas experience in 2011. So it was a delight to be able to offer something back to a place that had kept us warm and snug during several snow snaps.

I was asked to speak for two 90 minute sessions. One session was on listening in ministry. Another session was on listening in mission. It was fun to work over zoom and to invite participants into various listening experiences all while I was projected on screen. To help with engagement, one session involved lectio divina and sharing in pairs (the photo was taken while participants were sharing in pairs). The other session involved two case studies with group work.

The sessions were based on my cross-training research into the social impact of shared spiritual practices. It has been really helpful to think about the implications of the research for congregational leaders. I am 11 months into what is a 12 month project. So to be asked to think about the “so what” was perfect timing really.

It was also an integrative and redemptive experience. With Mark Johnston, during 2015-2020, I had developed and taught a course called Listening in Mission. So it was a rich experience five years later to return to those notes and think about how my current research into shared spiritual practices might inform and expand my thinking.

Thanks Cuddesdon for inviting me. Thanks Psychology Cross-Training Fellowship for the current research opportunities.

Relational labour and faith-based digital activism book chapter acceptance

A chapter I wrote – “Relational labour and faith-based digital activism: theorising the interplay between online and offline” – has been accepted by the editors and signed to the publishers (Bloomsbury). Hooray.

The initial research was presented at the Global Network for Digital Theology in June 2024. I thought I was just clearing my throat methodologically. So I was delightfully surprised to be invited to turn the paper into words a few months later. I submitted a chapter in April 2025 and revisions in June 2025. The chapter is due for release in 2026 in a volume titled – Disconnected: Digital Theology in and between Contexts, edited by Florian Hoehne and Frida Mannerfelt.

The book chapter is the second publication resulting from my stint as a Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities at the University of Edinburgh in the summer of 2024. The first was a journal article, recently published in Theology.

Visualizing online climate change activism: public eco-theologies in grassroots climate-justice organizations. Theology 128(4), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X251354942

Having multiple academic outputs (with more announcements to come) from a Visiting Fellowship is most encouraging.

Here’s the abstract for “Relational labour and faith-based digital activism: theorising the interplay between online and offline”:

Real life is invariably more complex than ideal theories. This paper describes research into how digital activists in faith-based organisations advocate for justice.

An initial literature review located typologies of online activism that originated in the USA and Europe. This raised the question of how to decolonise existing theories of digital activism. Identity, power and ethics in research suggested the need for a case study approach to centre the digital activism of indigenous communities. A side-by-side approach in research was also developed that brought visual grammar analysis of digital images into dialogue with interviews with activists.

However, in the real world, this ideal research design encountered the reality that my participants were conducting digital activism in their spare time. Auto-ethnographic reflection on how activists responded to my requests for interviews helped me realise that their responses were a valuable source of data. Relational labour is a concept that explains how my participants were activating for justice amid the mundane realities of their offline lives. Theologically, Jesus affirmed relational labour when he observed the tax collector and the widow making offerings in the temple.

My description of idealised methodologies, real-world research experiences and a theory of relational labour has implications for digital theology. Digital worlds are profoundly contextual worlds. Research must consider not only identity, power and ethics but also how offline realities shape online representations. While most researchers express gratitude to their interview participants, in this paper, I am equally grateful to the research participants who said no and later.

presenting social impact of shared spiritual practices research at Ecclesiology and Ethnography conference 2025

It was really helpful to present my social impact of shared religious practices research at the 2025 Ecclesiology and Ethnography conference in Durham, UK last week.

First, it’s a long way from New Zealand to England and there are geographic degrees of isolation that inevitably result. So it’s always good to be presenting internationally, maintaining connections and developing networks.

Second, the Ecclesiology and Ethnography conference is a lot of fun. There’s live music on the Wednesday. There’s a constructive and encouraging ethos. There are people who remember me from previous years, and I remember them. So it’s simply a great conference to be part of.

Third, I had presented on the research at the biennial International Association for the Psychology of Religion conference in Birmingham a few weeks earlier. So it was good to be able to return to a powerpoint and a presentation I had already worked on, rather than starting from scratch.

Fourth, it was fascinating presenting the same research to practical theologians (Ecclesiology and Ethnography conference) and not psychologists of religion (IAPR). Different audiences, different interests. So it was interesting reflecting on what I wanted to change, and why and what that said about psychologically-engaged theology. It was also interesting to have different questions being asked. The IAPR questions focused on research design. In contrast, several E and E conference questions pushed me to consider further research.

• Could I imagine doing shared spiritual practice online?
• Was there any indication that some participants might struggle with Bible engagement? How might those who are neurodiverse engage with Christian practices like lectio divina?

Several other E and E conference questions suggested further theoretical dialogue partners.

• Had I thought of engaging John Zizoulas and his work on somatic modes of attention?
• Was there any resonance with my work and that of Helmut Rosa’s work on resonance?

These are helpful suggestions and give me food for thought.

Finally, my thanks to the Ecclesiology and Ethnography conference organisors for accepting my paper. My thanks to the John Templeton Foundation, for providing the funding to make possible not only the long haul travel but also the in-country train travel, conference fees and accommodation.

the anxiety of interdisciplinary research

Interdisciplinary research is certainly anxious making. Last week, I presented my social impact of selected religious practices research at the biennial International Association for the Psychology of Religion conference in Birmingham.

Presenting internationally to psychologists researching religion was certainly not on my 2025 bingo sheet as the year begun. But with the encouragement of the Psychology and Theology Cross training team at the University of Birmingham and the generous offer of financial support from the John Templeton Foundation, my abstract was accepted and I found myself as a practical theologian stepping across academic disciplines.

It was a work in progress presentation. I had completed data collection the evening before I departed New Zealand, so my paper focused on the value of listening in community building and the lack of empirical research into participant experiences of engaging in religious practices. I introduced my research methods, sharing how I was doing action research, inviting participants to share in 8 sessions of lectio divina and gathering data through focus groups, a longitudinal survey, individual diaries and my participant observation. I offered some memorable quotes, from an initial code of two focus groups that I wrapped up, one in June, the other in early July.

And then the time for questions. From experts from other disciplines! How would they respond to my research? Anxiously, I invited questions.

• A first hand went up. They asked why I called what I was doing action research. I noted first that I was researching action, in the sharing together of the practice of lectio divina. Further, as I implemented my design, I made adjustments in response to events that occurred during sessions. Third, my grant application included the words “pilot study” and one of my stated outcomes was to make connections with other scholars researching spiritual practices with a view to further research. So I hoped my initial work would spiral into further research of action.
• A second hand went up. They said they liked the design and asked what Bible passages I used in the lectio divina sessions. I replied the story of Moses and the burning bush in Exodus 3 and the transfiguration in Matthew 17.
• A third hand went up. They congratulated me on my research and asked for more understanding of how practising lectio divina might strengthen community. I responded with a story shared by one of my participants in an interview.

The five minutes for questions was complete. I was done. I had survived. And still alive.

My research into the social impact of selected religious practices had been treated with thoughtful respect. The questions had been genuine.

“It’s really a joy to listen to other people” research poster

My research poster I presented at the Psychology-engaged Theology Conference in Birmingham, 2025 as part of a Capstone event for the Psychologically-Engaged Theologians Cross-training fellowship I have been part of. The poster is a “work in progress” – a preliminary analysis of half of the data from half of the research cohorts I have conducted.

a researching life and 24% of my winter evenings

Last night was another session in my research into the social impact of spiritual practices. It was raining and misty as I drove to Cohort D for our sixth evening sharing in spiritual practice.

I began this data gathering phase of the research on 1 May. It’s now the 31st of July. I’ve conducted 26 sessions with 4 cohorts over the last 92 days. 24% of my evenings this winter have been out and about researching!!

Thankfully, only a few nights have been raining. Pleasingly, all my participants have been engaged, engaging and informative. Gratifyingly I expect to shortly have 7 focus groups, 23 weekly journals and 64 survey forms. That’s a very rich store of qualitative data to inform my research into the social impact of shared spiritual practices (as part of the Psychologically engaged theology crosss-training with John Templeton)

(I know that social media posts are supposed to have visual images to draw attention. But honestly, it was too wet, dark and cold last night to grab an image of a wet and cold Dunedin night!)

emoji-gesis! Visualising online climate change activism: public eco-theologies in grassroots climate-justice organisations article

I’m delighted to have some new research published in Theology journal.

Taylor, S. (2025). Visualizing online climate change activism: public eco-theologies in grassroots climate-justice organizations. Theology, 128(4), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X251354942

Keywords – climate justice – digital activism – public theology – social media – visual grammar

My paper explores how visual images are used in digital activism. Visual images are a key dimension of online communication. I research the social media visual images of two UK Christian organisations activating for climate justice.

I describe visual grammar analysis and emoji-gesis. I demonstrate how colour, perspective and composition read the header images of these two activist organisations. I do emoji-gesis by tracking how emoji’s communicate different activist journeys.

The visual grammar of the two organisations is distinctive. The visual posting is a public theology that communicates activist journeys, intergenerational participation and prayer. Images of prayer as public witness offer a unique online activism, different from how secular activist organisations mobilise collective action. The research has practical implications for Christian organisations. It encourages developing unique visual identities rather than one-size fits all approaches to activism.

I’m delighted for several reasons.

1. Its great to have some emoji-gesis published. The article includes analysis of emojis used online in climate justice organisations. There is an entire paragraph where I write with the emojis (the Theology journal kindly let me offer a colour version for free).
2. It’s always great to be published academically and to watch work grow and improve through peer review and copy editing.
3. This is the first public research output emerging from my research fellowship with IASH, Edinburgh. There has been a long slow burn – applying for the research fellowship, navigating research ethics in a different university, learning in a new city.
4. It’s a placemarker and the first in what will be a range of outputs from the Grassroots digital activisms project. There is a book chapter accepted. The April 2025 colloquium is a work in progress toward a special issue of a journal. There is ongoing research which could well result in more outputs.
5. To have all this emerging from what was such a fun 7 weeks in Edinburgh is very satisfying.

baking cakes and marking research transitions

Three of my action research cohorts have finished in recent weeks. As part of our ending, I’ve enjoyed baking cakes.

Banana cakes, with either chocolate or lemon flavoured icing!

I’ve baked cakes for several reasons.

1. It marks a change. Probably as much for me as for my participants, it’s a way of marking and ending. As I cream the sugar and mash the bananas, there’s a chance to reflect on our time together and be aware of a change.
2. It expresses gratitude for time. My participants have generously given eight hours to share together in spiritual practice over eight sessions. Some research projects offer incentives to participants, like book vouchers or cash payments, to thank them for their time. However, financial incentives can make the research feel more transactional and might not match the motivations of my participants. A homemade cake feels an appropriate thankyou for my particular cohorts.
3. It manages the debrief. Once the final pieces of data are gathered, I offer to share a brief explanation of the research design. Some participants are interested. Other participants aren’t. Having a cake provides a way to relationally manage the range of responses. I offer serviettes and invite people to take a slice of cake and leave if they wish. Or to stay, enjoy the cake and learn a bit more about the research. People are different and the cake help manage the debrief with a bit of humour and humanity.
4. It navigates a relational transition. The ending of data gathering means there is a farewell. This is with myself as the researcher. It can also be between the participants. Some people want to linger, to ask me a specific question, to make an observation or to arrange to connect in a different way with someone they have enjoyed connecting with a bit more deeply. Having cake helps with this relational transition.

I’ve not baked cakes for other research projects. But it’s been an appropriate way to end this project and mark transitions with the different cohorts who have shared with me in religious practice over this particular piece of John Templeton funded research.

Blessed are the ethnographers

Blessed are those who observe (Psalm 106:3).

After 21 sessions facilitating shared spiritual practice, this week I found myself starting to run out of pages in my participant observation research journal. Which meant I was blessed to be able to buy a second research journal.

I am conducting action research into the social impact of spiritual practices. As part of a John Templeton funded project, I’m currently running 4 cohorts in the late afternoon and evenings. I’m gathering data through focus groups, along with short surveys at the start, middle and end. I’m also inviting participants to keep a weekly journal, to help me understand their individual experiences over time. Finally, I’m also observing. Which means taking notes of responses and interactions.

After every session, I write these notes up as research memos. Often stretching to 3 pages, these research memos will help me remember what happened, when I come to analyse the data in a few months time. The research memos also enable me to record my experiences, helping me get the impressions in my own head down on paper, as a further source of data.

My observations of 21 sessions mean pages and pages of notes. So a milestone this week, after 20 hours of facilitating and observing, at the three-quarter mark, to realise I would need a another brand new research journal.

In a curious quirk, the Psalm for this morning offered encouragement. First, in ways similar to the beatitudes, God blesses those who observe. Ethnography and research memos gain God’s favour. They are empirical methods that value human interactions, create structure in gathering data from lived experience and make the researcher transparent.

The rest of Psalm 106, verse 3 provides a reason for observing – “do what is just.” Ethnography invites critical reflection on the practices of the church. Practical theologians use observation as a tool in bringing change.

Sometimes church practices contribute to injustice. When that happens, ethnography and observation become a prophetic call for change. Sometimes church practices contribute to life. When that happens, ethnography and observation offers encouragement in the seeking of God’s justice hear on earth.

I’m glad that my ethnographic research is blessed :).

researching the sounds of silence

As I explore spiritual practice, I find that sounds are being magnified. This week, as I researched the social impact of the spiritual practice of silence, I recognised

• a heater whirring
• human voices making introductions
• the turn of paper, the scratch of pen on paper as survey forms are completed,
• a match being struck and a candle lit, calling us to silence
• a phone timer sounding to call us out of silence
• the exhale of a person’s breath as a lit candle is blown out
• the rustle of lolly wrappers as an ending treat

Such are the sounds of Cohort C experiencing the spiritual practice of shared silence. This is one of 5 cohorts I am researching with as part of my John Templeton funded 12 month research of the social impact of spiritual practices.

an open door to welcome cohort C

Cohort C in my action research into the social impact of spiritual practices began last night. There was an open door on a chilly autumn evening.

Cohort C is a variation of cohort A, B and D (which begins tonight). Cohort C is shorter – 4 weeks not 8. Cohort C has different snacks – Werthers Originals. Cohort C is a different practice – silence. There are reasons for these variations, which I might explain in a future post.

But amid the changes, the same four ways to gather data remain. As part of the Psychology and Theology Cross-training research fellowship funded by John Templeton through the University of Birmingham (my project is described here), I am gathering data using surveys, focus group, individual journals and my participation. Together, this gives me qualitative and quantitative data, shared individually and with others.

On the first night we made introductions. Spiritual practices were introduced, first in general, then specifically in relation to silence. A candle was lit and we settled into a period of shared silence. We began with 10 minutes on our first night. It will be 20 minutes the second week, and 30 minutes the third week. Could sitting in silence with others have a social impact?

a table to welcome research cohort B

Yesterday involved laying a table of welcome for cohort B in research investigating the social impact of spiritual practices. The welcome included the offer of participant diaries to record individual experiences and a pre-survey. Plus cheese and crackers and my research diary for ethnographic observations as I introduce spiritual practices and we begin 8 weeks of exploration.

There is a lot of energy involved in recruiting participants, then finding a time and venue that works. So week 1 has a sense of anticipation and expectancy, as strangers connect, questions are clarified and we settle in our shared experience of spiritual practice.

The highlight was a participant holding two types of journal diary – one hard cover, the other white daisy – one in each hand, weighing which they would choose as a companion for recording their experiences over 8 weeks.

grassroots digital activism 12 months on

A year ago today I submitted my research ethics approval to undertake novel research into grassroots digital activism in climate justice. I was wanting to hit the ground running with my Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities (IASH) Fellowship through Edinburgh University in June and July 2024.

My interest in researching grassroots digital activism in climate justice had been sparked by two experiences. First, research with Te Pae Tawhiti 2040 project on the future of theological education for the Anglican Province of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia and being in Fiji hearing the priority of climate justice among those in the Anglican Diocese of Polynesia. Second, being asked to write a book chapter on mission and digital cultures for a handbook with Oxford University Press and finding less research on the marks of mission of treasuring creation than telling and tending disciples.

Thankfully, the ethics approval was granted and the Fellowship with IASH was a great experience. In the 12 months since, a range of research outputs have flowed. These include a journal article with Theology and an academic book chapter with Bloomsbury (both forthcoming). There have been 4 presentations of the research. Plus a successful 1 day Colloquium back in Edinburgh in April this year, which I continue to progress toward an edited book.

Yesterday I pulled out the ethics consent forms. I needed them as I talked with a digital activist group about their possible participation in the project and as I write up a second book chapter. It was uncanny how 12 months on, the ethics consent forms still exactly fit with how the research has unfolded.

Looking at the ethics consent forms helped me recall the excitement and vulnerability of starting a new research project and stepping into an overseas university ethics process. Along with joy at what has resulted and hopefulness about the ongoing future of this particular research project.